3.8. Standardizing data

Some data are recorded in naturally meaningful units; examples are

• height of adults in cm

• temperature in \(^{\circ}C\)

In other cases, units may be hard to interpret because we don’t have a sense of what a typical score is, based on general knowledge

• scores on an IQ test marked out of 180

• height of 6-year-olds in cm

A further problem is quantifying how unusual a data value is when values are presented as different units

• High school grades from different countries or systems (A-levels vs IB vs Abitur vs…..)

In all cases it can be useful to present data in standard units.

Two common ways of doing this are:

• Convert data to Z-scores

• Convert data to quantiles

In this section we will review both these approaches.

3.8.1. Set up Python Libraries

As usual you will need to run this code block to import the relevant Python libraries

# Set-up Python libraries - you need to run this but you don't need to change it
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import scipy.stats as stats
import pandas as pd
import seaborn as sns
sns.set_theme(style='white')
import statsmodels.api as sm
import statsmodels.formula.api as smf

3.8.2. Import a dataset to work with

Let’s look at a fictional dataset containing some body measurements for 50 individuals

data=pd.read_csv('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jillxoreilly/StatsCourseBook_2024/main/data/BodyData.csv')
display(data)

	ID	sex	height	weight	age
0	101708	M	161	64.8	35
1	101946	F	165	68.1	42
2	108449	F	175	76.6	31
3	108796	M	180	81.0	31
4	113449	F	179	80.1	31
5	114688	M	172	74.0	42
6	119187	F	148	54.8	45
7	120679	F	160	64.0	44
8	120735	F	188	88.4	32
9	124269	F	172	74.0	29
10	124713	M	175	76.6	26
11	127076	M	180	81.0	28
12	131626	M	162	65.6	35
13	132218	M	170	72.3	29
14	132609	F	172	74.0	41
15	134660	F	159	63.2	34
16	135195	M	169	71.4	42
17	140073	F	168	70.6	34
18	140114	M	195	95.1	41
19	145185	F	157	61.6	45
20	146279	F	180	81.0	30
21	146519	F	172	74.0	34
22	151451	F	171	73.1	37
23	152597	M	172	74.0	27
24	154672	M	167	69.7	39
25	155594	F	165	68.1	25
26	158165	M	175	76.6	45
27	159457	F	176	77.4	36
28	162323	M	173	74.8	31
29	166948	M	174	75.7	28
30	168411	M	175	76.6	29
31	168574	F	163	66.4	30
32	169209	F	159	63.2	45
33	171236	F	164	67.2	34
34	172289	M	181	81.9	27
35	173925	M	189	89.3	25
36	176598	F	169	71.4	37
37	177002	F	180	81.0	36
38	178659	M	181	81.9	26
39	180992	F	177	78.3	31
40	183304	F	176	77.4	30
41	184706	M	183	83.7	40
42	185138	M	169	71.4	28
43	185223	F	170	72.3	41
44	186041	M	175	76.6	25
45	186887	M	154	59.3	26
46	187016	M	161	64.8	32
47	198157	M	180	81.0	33
48	199112	M	172	74.0	33
49	199614	F	164	67.2	31

3.8.3. Z score

The Z-score tells us how many standard deviations above or below the mean of the distribution a given value lies.

Let’s convert our weights to Z-scores. We will need to know the mean and standard deviation of weight:

print(data.weight.mean())
print(data.weight.std())

73.73
7.891438140058334

We can then calculate a Z-score for each person’s weight.

• Someone whose weight is exactly on the mean (74kg) will have a Z-score of 0.

• Someone whose weight is one standard deviation below the mean (65kg) will have a Z-score of -1 etc

# Create a new column and put the calcualted z-scores in it
data['WeightZ'] = (data.weight - data.weight.mean())/data.weight.std()
data

	ID	sex	height	weight	age	WeightZ
0	101708	M	161	64.8	35	-1.131606
1	101946	F	165	68.1	42	-0.713431
2	108449	F	175	76.6	31	0.363685
3	108796	M	180	81.0	31	0.921252
4	113449	F	179	80.1	31	0.807204
5	114688	M	172	74.0	42	0.034214
6	119187	F	148	54.8	45	-2.398802
7	120679	F	160	64.0	44	-1.232982
8	120735	F	188	88.4	32	1.858977
9	124269	F	172	74.0	29	0.034214
10	124713	M	175	76.6	26	0.363685
11	127076	M	180	81.0	28	0.921252
12	131626	M	162	65.6	35	-1.030230
13	132218	M	170	72.3	29	-0.181209
14	132609	F	172	74.0	41	0.034214
15	134660	F	159	63.2	34	-1.334358
16	135195	M	169	71.4	42	-0.295257
17	140073	F	168	70.6	34	-0.396632
18	140114	M	195	95.1	41	2.707998
19	145185	F	157	61.6	45	-1.537109
20	146279	F	180	81.0	30	0.921252
21	146519	F	172	74.0	34	0.034214
22	151451	F	171	73.1	37	-0.079833
23	152597	M	172	74.0	27	0.034214
24	154672	M	167	69.7	39	-0.510680
25	155594	F	165	68.1	25	-0.713431
26	158165	M	175	76.6	45	0.363685
27	159457	F	176	77.4	36	0.465061
28	162323	M	173	74.8	31	0.135590
29	166948	M	174	75.7	28	0.249638
30	168411	M	175	76.6	29	0.363685
31	168574	F	163	66.4	30	-0.928855
32	169209	F	159	63.2	45	-1.334358
33	171236	F	164	67.2	34	-0.827479
34	172289	M	181	81.9	27	1.035299
35	173925	M	189	89.3	25	1.973024
36	176598	F	169	71.4	37	-0.295257
37	177002	F	180	81.0	36	0.921252
38	178659	M	181	81.9	26	1.035299
39	180992	F	177	78.3	31	0.579109
40	183304	F	176	77.4	30	0.465061
41	184706	M	183	83.7	40	1.263395
42	185138	M	169	71.4	28	-0.295257
43	185223	F	170	72.3	41	-0.181209
44	186041	M	175	76.6	25	0.363685
45	186887	M	154	59.3	26	-1.828564
46	187016	M	161	64.8	32	-1.131606
47	198157	M	180	81.0	33	0.921252
48	199112	M	172	74.0	33	0.034214
49	199614	F	164	67.2	31	-0.827479

Look down the table for some heavy and light people. Do their z-scores look like you would expect?

Disadvantages of the Z score

Z score tells us how many standard deviations above or below the mean a datapoint lies.

We can use some hand ‘rules of thumb’ to know how unusual a Z-score is, as long as the data distribution is approximately normal: * Don’t worry if you don’t know what the Normal distribution is yet - you will learn about this in detail later in the course

The Z-score does have a couple of disadvantages:

• it is only really meaningful for symmetrical data distributions (especially the Normal distribution) - for skewed distributions, there will be momre datapoints with a Z-score of, say, +2, than -2

Additionally, the Z-score is not easily understood by non statistically trained people

It is therefore sometimes more meaningful to standardize data by presenting them as quantiles

3.8.4. Quantiles

Quantiles (or centiles) tell us what proportion of data points are expected to exceed a certain value. This is easy to interpret.

For example, say my six year old daughter is 125cm tall, would you say she is tall for her age? You probably have no idea - this is in contrast to adult heights where people might have a sense of the distribution due to general knowledge (eg 150cm is small and 180cm is tall)

In fact, a a 6 year old with height 125cm lies on the 95th centile, which means they are taller than 95% of children the same age (will definitley look tall in the playground).

To calculate a given quantile of a dataset we use df.quantile(), eg

# find the 90th centile for height in out dataframe
data.height.quantile(q=0.9) # get 90th centile

181.0

The 90th centile is 181cm, ie 10% of people are taller than 181cm.

Adding quantiles to the table can be done using df.qcut(), which categorizes the data into quantiles. For example, I can produe a table saying which decile each person’s weight falls into as follows:

• Deciles are 10ths, in the same way that centiles are 100ths

  • if someone’s weight in the 0th decile, that means their weight is in the bottom 10% of the sample

  • if someone’s weight is in the 9th decile, it mmeans they are in teh top 10% ot the sample (heavier than 90% of people)

data['weightQ'] = pd.qcut(data.weight, 10, labels = False) 
data

	ID	sex	height	weight	age	WeightZ	weightQ
0	101708	M	161	64.8	35	-1.131606	1
1	101946	F	165	68.1	42	-0.713431	2
2	108449	F	175	76.6	31	0.363685	6
3	108796	M	180	81.0	31	0.921252	7
4	113449	F	179	80.1	31	0.807204	7
5	114688	M	172	74.0	42	0.034214	4
6	119187	F	148	54.8	45	-2.398802	0
7	120679	F	160	64.0	44	-1.232982	1
8	120735	F	188	88.4	32	1.858977	9
9	124269	F	172	74.0	29	0.034214	4
10	124713	M	175	76.6	26	0.363685	6
11	127076	M	180	81.0	28	0.921252	7
12	131626	M	162	65.6	35	-1.030230	1
13	132218	M	170	72.3	29	-0.181209	3
14	132609	F	172	74.0	41	0.034214	4
15	134660	F	159	63.2	34	-1.334358	0
16	135195	M	169	71.4	42	-0.295257	3
17	140073	F	168	70.6	34	-0.396632	3
18	140114	M	195	95.1	41	2.707998	9
19	145185	F	157	61.6	45	-1.537109	0
20	146279	F	180	81.0	30	0.921252	7
21	146519	F	172	74.0	34	0.034214	4
22	151451	F	171	73.1	37	-0.079833	4
23	152597	M	172	74.0	27	0.034214	4
24	154672	M	167	69.7	39	-0.510680	2
25	155594	F	165	68.1	25	-0.713431	2
26	158165	M	175	76.6	45	0.363685	6
27	159457	F	176	77.4	36	0.465061	7
28	162323	M	173	74.8	31	0.135590	5
29	166948	M	174	75.7	28	0.249638	5
30	168411	M	175	76.6	29	0.363685	6
31	168574	F	163	66.4	30	-0.928855	1
32	169209	F	159	63.2	45	-1.334358	0
33	171236	F	164	67.2	34	-0.827479	2
34	172289	M	181	81.9	27	1.035299	8
35	173925	M	189	89.3	25	1.973024	9
36	176598	F	169	71.4	37	-0.295257	3
37	177002	F	180	81.0	36	0.921252	7
38	178659	M	181	81.9	26	1.035299	8
39	180992	F	177	78.3	31	0.579109	7
40	183304	F	176	77.4	30	0.465061	7
41	184706	M	183	83.7	40	1.263395	9
42	185138	M	169	71.4	28	-0.295257	3
43	185223	F	170	72.3	41	-0.181209	3
44	186041	M	175	76.6	25	0.363685	6
45	186887	M	154	59.3	26	-1.828564	0
46	187016	M	161	64.8	32	-1.131606	1
47	198157	M	180	81.0	33	0.921252	7
48	199112	M	172	74.0	33	0.034214	4
49	199614	F	164	67.2	31	-0.827479	2

NOTE this is a bit fiddly as df.qcut won’t create empty bins. Since this dataset is quite small, we can’t create one bin for each centile as naturally some will be empty (as there are less than 100 datapoints)